<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dam Safety Rules – Take 2!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prairierivers.org/articles/2009/06/dam-safety-rules-take-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prairierivers.org/articles/2009/06/dam-safety-rules-take-2/</link>
	<description>Protecting Illinois streams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 09:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David DeHaven</title>
		<link>http://prairierivers.org/articles/2009/06/dam-safety-rules-take-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8292</link>
		<dc:creator>David DeHaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prairierivers.org/?p=2513#comment-8292</guid>
		<description>As a paddler, I apreciate you responding to the feedback and looking further into the matter.

The dams can undoubtedly be dangerous, especially to uninformed, poorly trained or careless or stupid paddlers, but eliminating virtually all legal paddling on large portions of those rivers by enforcing unworkable exclusion zones may not be the best approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a paddler, I apreciate you responding to the feedback and looking further into the matter.</p>
<p>The dams can undoubtedly be dangerous, especially to uninformed, poorly trained or careless or stupid paddlers, but eliminating virtually all legal paddling on large portions of those rivers by enforcing unworkable exclusion zones may not be the best approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

